Wednesday, 29 October 2014

NEW INTERVIEW!

Tatiana Fiodorova: "Art can change the society in order to make it more prepared to show that we have rights we must defend"

What was your motivation to become an artist?

I didn't want to become an artist I just followed some flows. My father was an artist too but he died very early when I was 6 years old and when I grow up I had no idea that I wanted to do that. When I finished the school I decided to become a fashion designer and started to study in Transnistria in Tiraspol College. After when I finished study I understood that my drawing skills weren't enough at all to do it. Then I decided to go to University of Chisinau and study graphic design and in the same time to continue to be the fashion designer and I have participated in several fashion festivals in  Ukraine, Russia... to show some art collections  but in the post-soviet public spaces, you need money to promote fashion. I'm tired of it because there was no money. I had all the time to spend money on sewing new collections. All collections I sewed myself with my hands. Also during my study at the university I start to be active as artist to exhibited art works in Chisinau at the gallery Brancusi. Then appeared cheap internet access and I became acquainted with contemporary art, began to work in a more conceptual way.. Now I'm pleased I found my way.When you are an artist you have a different vision and you have to express yourself. And in order to create a work you do not need a lot of money, unlike the fashion design. And I like to be an artist.


 How was your first project?

My father was an artist during the soviet ages, He was unknown artist and never exhibited somewhere.  He was also designer and photographer, and we were born the same day. He left a lot of interesting things, in addition to photographs, paintings, drawings: a homemade box of Cyrillic Russian letters, a book- a photocopy of Soviet publications on medicinal plants, stencils, sketches for the Soviet-era propaganda posters, and more. Moreover, he was an archivist and collector, gathering postcards and stamps, purely for pragmatic purposes, as he worked as a designer and decorator.
I decided to show his creativity through my memory of him and soviet time.. It was in 2004.
Two years ago in 2012 I did also a artist’s book with his painting, photos and draws. As I said he also was an amateur photographer and I remember very strongly his red darkroom bathroom where he used to process photos. It's interesting that trough my artistic life every time in different period appears the same topic but in different way.




Do you think that the figure of the artist is a sort of inheritance or an artist can learn how to be an artist?

I grew up as a normal person not as an artist at all. I discovered art just when I was at the University. I began to understand all my father's objects and activities when I studied art, until this moment this compilation was just images to me. Since then I started to contact with his creativity and I started to understand it...

What is the work that you feel most proud about?

Maybe is the book about my father’s project. For me it was important to do this in memory of him .. I tried to speak about how was in general the life of a soviet artist... he was an unknown artist and in that period was not very easy to be an artist. If you were not member of the Union of Artist, you couldn’t show your project to the public. I compared my situation thinking about what kind of freedom had my father and what freedom I have now. Now you can present almost everywhere. Therefore, the topic was: how the artist has social attitude with the state and the society, what kind of freedom he had?


Speak more about your book in details?

In soviet times everything was about propaganda, no freedom of expression at all.
 So, in this book I tried to ask “how easy was to be in the Union of artists?” “What kind of topic you must to speak about?”
I did an interview with a member of the Union of Artist, Victor Kuzmenko, who explained me a lot of interesting details about how they worked in the soviet times and how was the real situation. For me was really interesting to see the personal opinion of the artist and face it to the state rules. 
Also in the book you can see original material, artefacts of the soviet time: soviet banknote, paper of calendar. . You can see in the book how it looked public designed, and for me is amazing because not a lot of people can speak about this topic: and also some pictures taken during 70-80’s, so you can observe how the people looked during those ages. My father also used to go to the villages and selling photos, for example taking pictures of people there, different kind of people, for example you can see the collection of women with babies. The last part of the book is the personal pictures from my family’s archive: me, my sister, my mother and father. 



 You use different artistic formats such as photography, video, performance, etc. What each one of them means to you? How do you choose between them each time?

It depends on the message you want to share. You have a message and you have to choose which media is better. For example, I did my first performance in 2009, I've never done anything like this before and I guess you have to choose the best format for your message, the satisfactory one. Also, sometimes you feel that some formats are not enough for your message. For example it is happened with the book about my father... I felt that an exhibition wasn't enough to show his creativity.  The book was a format in which everything important could be contained. Very interesting experience to create book as art object by my hands.Photography as other medium I like very much because it is allows me to distance my selves from reality and be an observer.

You also focus on ordinary life and everyday objects. What do you think about the relationship between ordinary life and routine and art?

I cannot separate my life from my art. I think that my artistic feeling influences my whole life. It's not a process like this: right now I'm a normal person; now I'm an artist... there are so many intersections between the two aspects. Also when I'm having my 'normal routine' I keep on seeing interesting things in an artistic manner. 



Soviet passport project, by Tatiana Fiodorova

In your opinion, what is the political role of the art? Especially referred to nowadays Moldovan situation…

I cannot change politics’ way of acting or thinking, I don't have the possibility to speak with them but maybe I can change everyday audience attitude, because they can come to my exhibition and they can see something different. And also about the protest I report in my work, which could be a chance for changing something with art. I think that art can change something but I don't know if it's possible in our context. I think art cannot change polity, but it can change somehow the society in order to make it more prepared to show that we have rights we must defend, to show that we could have a better life.


How do you feel about art situation in Moldova? Do you think that art is a matter of education?

It's not really strong if we speak about art education and infrastructure.  We have three levels in art educational system which was shaped during soviet times; so the system is still traditional, nobody will teach you about new practice and media. Sometimes carried out workshops on various practices of contemporary art, but this is not enough to change the whole situation. General the art is still living in the past; we don’t have a lot of contemporary referents in Moldova.  As I said, contemporary art is not popular in Moldova, so the contemporary artist are not so well known . Also, many Moldovan artists immigrated to other countries. in my opinion, Moldova is almost in the same situation as the most part of the countries from the former Soviet space, not including perhaps Russia (namely in Moscow): lack of an infrastructure for contemporary art, no art galleries, museums, no quality art schooling, no institutions to educate valuable artists, curators, and critics of contemporary art. In Moldova, there is no art market and there is no demand for contemporary art. This fact can be considered as a positive feature, since it is not commercialized and art exists in its pure form. However, for Moldavian artist it is very difficult to live and create in spite of this whole system. After 20 years, the Moldovan contemporary art is still marginal, and the Moldovan society has few acquaintance of its existence. The artistes found themselves in the absence of the art scene, so they started talking about themselves in the West than at home, and also other artists moved to the West because of economic instability in the our country. Despite the fact that today the artist finds it hard to survive in such conditions, the Moldavian contemporary art exists. That I can say for sure.


Do you have some influences in your creative process?
It is really difficult to find person or artist. So many people. For example, Marina Abramovic. “I made performance the world is dirty, The artist must be dirty”. as a replica of the performance by the artist Marina Abramović , «The art is beautiful, the artist must be beautiful». The performance took place in the month of July in the gallery Karlin Studios, in Prague in 2012 . In this performance I was swimming in the dirt, rubbing myself with mud, to rethink the role of the artist in contemporary society. Today the artist does not create a high aesthetic value in terms of beauty, and the task of the artist is to be in the middle of political and social events. Thus, the artist bathing in public and political mud becomes an instrument of reproof and exposer of problems that plague society.Most of all I am biased environment in which I live, the political and social situation in the country. Pyotr Pavlensky is coming to my mind right now, because the cut off the ear yesterday to protest; I rather prefer to make performance dealing with my feelings inside. I don't like to be so provocative; otherwise it is more activism than artistic expression. But I don't think that they're two opposite terms, it's just different opinions or conceptions and different possibility of expressions for example Pussy Riots, for me a performance it's more therapeutic, in connection with my internal relationship with different topic and sometimes I don't want to show too much... it's more an internal process.

- What are your projects for the future?

I'm making a new book called Red Star; it's about a soviet factory. This is a story about my mother and soviet times... she was working in a factory during soviet times, but when the system broke down also the factory was in bankrupt and many people were thrown out. And in this factory there were more woman than men... so, the work focuses on how women manage to survive during soviet times. Before she lost her job, she bought a lot of stuff from this factory, thinking that in the future maybe it will be useful, maybe its price will increase...In that factory they produced mostly dresses and women clothes, the factory place is nowadays abandoned, so I took some pictures putting the clothes in the park, in soviet time it was called “ Lenin”. Now it is like forest with wild dogs. Now  it is dangerous to go there alone.
This project will be showed in November in one feminist project in Minsk, Belarus. It is international exhibition but more focus to the post-soviet countries. 


Red Start Project, by Tatiana Fiodorova

Do you have some advice for the future artist?

The most important is to think about yourself, who you are... to watch around you and express your feelings and thoughts. For me, a contemporary artist is primarily a person creates and forming new ideas and thoughts reworking his experience and his understanding of the world. After a deep reflex ion you can do whatever you want.

Interview by: Ruben Pulido and Francesco Brusa

MORE INFORMATION:


No comments:

Post a Comment